28 de febrero de 2010

porque murio mucho mas gente en Haiti que en Chile?


Why Haiti's smaller quake was worse than Chile's
By Colin Stark, Special to CNN
Poverty is what ultimately kills most people during an earthquake. Poverty means that little or no evaluation is made of seismic risk in constructing buildings and no zoning takes place. It means that building codes are not written, and even if they do exist they are difficult, or impossible, to enforce. It means the choice between building robustly or building cheaply is not a choice at all.
Haiti is a tragic illustration of this. Weak building materials and poor construction standards share much of the blame for the grotesque numbers of fatalities, injured and internally displaced people.

Revolución cubana hoy: el sueño de unos pocos

Escrito por Yoani Sánchez
sábado, 10 de enero de 2009

ImageUna pregunta en torno a los 50 años de la Revolución Cubana es si se trata del aniversario de lo ocurrido hace medio siglo o del cumpleaños de algo que aún está vivo. Las revoluciones tienen ambiciones de inmortalidad, vocación de parte aguas, ansias destructivas de lo que hubo antes, prisa por el futuro. Cuando una de ellas se jacta de cumplir medio siglo, en realidad su certificado de defunción se ha firmado muchos años atrás. Prolongarse en el tiempo, aferrarse en el poder, tener sueños de eternidad, es la forma de suicidarse que tienen las revoluciones.

Para la generación que fue testigo consciente del triunfo revolucionario y protagonista de los años fundacionales, la palabra “antes” significa lo previo a 1959. Sin embargo los nacidos entre los 70 y los 80 la interpretan de una manera muy diferente; para ellos la revolución es su pasado. Las conquistas que este proceso logró, especialmente las alcanzadas en la época de la subvención soviética, no produjeron en la nueva generación el efecto de salvación mesiánica, porque ellos nacieron en medio de su mejor momento y fueron testigos de su decadencia. Al no sentirse rescatados de ningún mal del pasado, les cuesta identificarse como beneficiarios del socialismo y esto les permite ser más objetivos, lo que los lleva a ser más críticos. Esa es la generación que tendrá en sus manos la decisión de cómo será el futuro y no podrán contar para ello con la experiencia de un “antes”, que no vivieron.

Leer más
Yoani Sanchez

yoani_sanchez.gif

27 de febrero de 2010

Las “gauchadas” tambien son corrupcion

Las coimas en efectivo son la corrupcion mas facil de entender, el empresario le deposita dolares en la cuenta de un testaferro del politico en Panama. Y el politico usa esos dineros (generalmente fuera del pais) para vivir como un principe

Las gauchadas es hacerle ganar contratos y concesiones con el estado a empresarios amigos. Los empresarios amigos pagan la gauchada con otras gauchadas. Le dan “una mano” presentandole gente poderosa , regala miles de pasajes , le “presta” el jet , contribuye para la campana politica, le da empleos a los amigos del politico, regala vehiculos para el partido, hace fiestas etc etc

Llevar una vida personal austera y no aceptar cash no es suficiente, para no ser corrupto no debe haber gauchadas de ningun tipo. Los negocios de las empresas privadas con el estado deben ser totalmente transparentes asignadas por licitacion o remate publico. Y no debe aceptarse ningun tipo de gauchada de ningun empresario
El Pepe sigue sin entender la etica y la ley, el pepe como los peronistas y chavez piensan que el estado es algo que pueden usar como les cante para favorecer a unos y perjudicar a otros.
En el primer mundo las gauchadas estan penadas por ley y unos cuantos politicos han ido presos por hacer "gauchadas". La gauchada es endemica en la cultura tercermundista de Argentina y Brasil . Se ve que Mujica nunca recibio un curso de etica ni le ensenaron sus mayores, pero la ignorancia de la ley no es atenuante en la justicia penal.

imperialismo brasilero - territorios conquistados a Bolivia Uruguay y Paraguay






Bolivia Guerra del Acre 1899-1903


imperialismo brasilero en Bolivia 1903 - anexion del Acre













Bolivia antes de la guerra con Brasil
La Guerra del Acre fue un conflicto limítrofe y bélico entre Bolivia y Brasil que afectó también al Perú (el conflicto ocurrió en dos fases durante el periodo 1899-1903) por el dominio del territorio del Acre rico en árboles de caucho y yacimientos auríferos. Concluyó con la victoria de Brasil y la consecuente anexión de territorios que habían pertenecido a Bolivia y Perú.
El Tratado de Petrópolis es un tratado de paz firmado entre Bolivia y Brasil en la ciudad brasileña de Petrópolis el 17 de noviembre de 1903, por el cual Bolivia cedió una superficie aproximada de 191.000 km², que corresponden en su mayor parte con el actual estado del Acre, al Brasil, ya en 1877 por el "Tratado de Paz y Amistad" o Tratado de Ayacucho Bolivia había cedido otros 164.242 km² de la región del Acre que fueron anexados por Brasil a la entonces provincia y actual estado de Amazonas.
Mucho hablan los latinoamericanos del imperialismo britanico que reocupo las Malvinas a Argentina en 1833, pero nada dicen del imperialismo brasilero que le robo a Bolivia 25% de su territorio, 25 millones de hectareas en 1903



Bolivia despues de la guerra con Brasil

Argentina bajo los Kirchners socialismo para los enemigos capitalismo para los amigos

Argentina under the Kirchners

Socialism for foes, capitalism for friends

While some private businesses in Argentina have faced harassment or even nationalisation, others have flourished thanks to political contacts

Feb 25th 2010 | BUENOS AIRES | From The Economist print edition

WHEN Néstor Kirchner took over as Argentina’s president in 2003, his country’s economy was already on the mend after a sickening collapse 18 months earlier that had prompted debt default and devaluation. Lambasting the IMF and privatisation, Mr Kirchner extended the state’s control over the economy. Rising world prices for Argentina’s farm-commodity exports and government pump-priming unleashed an economic boom. This made Mr Kirchner a popular hero, and secured the election of his wife, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, as his successor in 2007. She has continued his policies. Mr Kirchner was last year elected as a congressman, but according to former officials he still takes many executive decisions.

Enjoying almost complete political dominance, Argentina’s first couple swatted away critics who accused them of everything from illegal enrichment to wrecking institutions. They are still trying to do so. Ms Fernández frequently accuses Argentina’s leading newspapers of making up stories to discredit her government. But it is getting harder. Thanks to the world recession, rising inflation and a series of political errors, her approval rating in opinion polls has fallen to 20%. After losing a working majority in a congressional election last year, the government is on the verge of losing control of key committees of Congress as well.

Yet this is no ordinary slump of the type familiar to long-serving governments in other democracies. Four of the president’s private secretaries are being investigated for enriching themselves illegally. Two, Julio Daniel Álvarez and Fabián Gutiérrez, recently resigned. Meanwhile Mr Kirchner has been criticised for a transaction in October 2008 in which he swapped pesos for $2m shortly before the value of the currency fell sharply. He says this was to buy a stake in a hotel company that was priced in dollars and insists that he was not speculating against the peso. However, the Kirchners admit that their personal wealth has increased dramatically while they have been in office.

“Governability”, Mr Kirchner said at his inauguration in 2003, “cannot be a synonym for impunity…obscure agreements, the political manipulation of institutions, or spurious pacts behind society’s back.” In power, the Kirchners have frequently belied those fine words. They have bullied institutions that have got in their way, from the judiciary to the Central Bank. They have used the power of the state to harass groups they see as hostile, from farmers to utility companies. Meanwhile, some of their allies have thrived.

The Santa Cruz connection

Both the Kirchners are from the left wing of the dominant Peronist movement. Both claim to have been active in the resistance to Argentina’s military government. Mr Kirchner, the child of parents of Swiss and Croatian stock, forged his political career in his home province of Santa Cruz, in far-off Patagonia. He was its governor from 1991 until he moved into the Casa Rosada, the presidential palace. Rafael Flores, a former Peronist congressman who represented the province for 12 years, says that Mr Kirchner transferred his way of operating and his economic philosophy from the province to the national stage. “In Santa Cruz,” says Mr Flores, “Kirchner behaved in all the ways he would when he became bigger in the country: manipulation, pressurising mayors, persecuting people who didn’t agree with him.”

Mr Kirchner rarely talks to reporters. When president, he gave no press conferences. Neither he nor Ms Fernández has responded to The Economist’s requests for interviews. So we do not have their answer to such criticisms.

Santa Cruz is remote and sparsely populated, but rich in oil and gas. As governor, Mr Kirchner ploughed hydrocarbons revenues into public-sector jobs and infrastructure projects. Oil and gas companies needed his administration’s approval to get exploration contracts. The Kirchners developed a tight network of trusted friends in Santa Cruz, several of whom followed them to Buenos Aires (where they were dubbed “the penguins”). Mr Kirchner’s sister, Alicia, is the minister for social development. Another aide from Santa Cruz is Julio de Vido, an architect who was introduced to the Kirchners in the 1980s. He served as the province’s economy minister when Mr Kirchner was governor. Since 2003 he has been Argentina’s minister of planning, in charge of a vast bureaucratic empire that spans public works, transport, communications, energy and mining. Mr Kirchner also appointed Mr de Vido’s wife to a senior post in the government’s internal-audit agency.

Mr Kirchner’s governorship is remembered for something else too: the mystery surrounding some $600m in financial assets belonging to the province. (A former official in a previous national government who has investigated the matter thinks the true figure was closer to $1 billion.) In 1999 the province sold, at a big profit, shares in YPF, the privatised national oil company, which it had received in 1993 in lieu of unpaid royalties. It held the proceeds abroad. The provincial government said that the interest was invested in public works. Opponents of the Kirchners in Santa Cruz accept that some of this money has returned to the province. Mr Kirchner has never explained what happened to the rest.

Penguins in Buenos Aires

On becoming president Mr Kirchner struck up a friendship with Hugo Chávez, but the first couple’s approach to the private sector has been a bit more subtle than that of their Venezuelan counterpart. They have nationalised, but sparingly. The government has taken over the troubled national airline and the private pension system, and also set up several new state companies. Meanwhile, some private businesses have faced regulation to the point of harassment.

The Kirchners retained an economic emergency law that, among other things, allows the government to change the contracts under which privatised utilities provide services. It was passed as a temporary measure after the peso devaluation of 2002. Regulators, previously independent, have been turned into rubber stamps. Now it is the government that sets utility prices. The method often involves phone calls from the offices of Mr de Vido or Guillermo Moreno, the secretary of commerce. The freezing of the retail price of natural gas has discouraged investment in exploration. The price of beef has been held down by adding a high export tax, encouraging farmers to sell in the domestic market. Farmers are now able to export only at the government’s discretion.

Despite these price controls, both formal and informal, Argentina suffers from high inflation. In 2007 Mr Moreno’s team changed the way the consumer-price index was measured by the National Statistics and Census Institute (INDEC). This had the effect of keeping the official inflation figure in single digits. Private estimates are much higher (see chart). The credibility of the official figures took a further knock this month when union leaders sympathetic to the Kirchners called for wage rises of 25% to make up for inflation. The lower official number has meant the government has made a net saving on its inflation-linked bonds of $1.7 billion, according to a former finance official.

The government also gets involved in private business dealings that should be beyond its remit. Two examples stand out. The first involves Shell which, during 2004, had talked to Brazil’s Petrobras about selling its assets in Argentina and Brazil. The company changed its mind after details of these talks leaked. Shortly afterwards it raised prices at its petrol stations in Argentina. In response Mr Kirchner urged Argentines not to buy “even a can of oil” from the company. Mr Moreno’s office then fined Shell 23 times in 2006 for undersupplying the market. According to Juan José Aranguren, the company’s head in Argentina, Shell was providing 8% more petrol than the year before, a bigger increase than the market average.

Mr Aranguren faced 57 arrest warrants in 2007, again for allegedly undersupplying the market, each carrying a prison term of between six months and four years. All of them are still in the courts. Next the government ordered Shell to shut down a refinery for alleged environmental violations, allowing it to reopen without explanation five days later. At the same time, other people in the administration were offering Shell opportunities to sell its Argentine assets, says Mr Aranguren.

The second example of government interference involves the Clarín Group, Argentina’s most powerful media business. In September last year, 200 tax inspectors descended on the group’s offices. No one seemed to know who sent them. The tax agency’s boss denied ordering the inspection. The government accused its opponents of organising the raid to make it look bad. The group’s daily newspaper, Clarín, and its television stations have been fierce critics of Ms Fernández’s government. The taxmen arrived as Argentina’s Congress prepared to debate a new media law that will force Clarín to sell many of its radio and television interests.

There is a case for regulating media ownership in Argentina, and Clarín’s market dominance would be considered unacceptable in some countries. But the main effect of the new law is to weaken the president’s chief critic in the media. This blow against the Clarín Group followed another. In August the Argentine football confederation broke a contract with Clarín for the transmission of live league matches, and signed a new one with the state channel. Clarín alleges that Mr Kirchner was behind the switch.

The pension-fund piggy bank

State control of Argentina’s private sector has been tightened further since the nationalisation of the private pension funds in December 2008. Because the funds had big shareholdings in many of Argentina’s companies, the government, in the form of the National Social Security Administration (ANSES), now has the right to nominate directors to the boards of these firms, a prerogative it has exercised by placing directors at around 20 companies. ANSES performs another function, too. With the economy slowing ahead of the congressional election in June last year, Ms Fernández ramped up spending on public works and the unemployed, treating the pension system as a piggy bank. Local economists estimate that the central government’s accounts last year went into the red for the first time since 2002. The pension system is one of its main creditors.

The Central Bank, which in theory is independent, has also been brought within the president’s direct control. In December the government floated the idea of creating a “Bicentennial Fund” with the aim of using the bank’s hard-currency reserves to pay off a group of foreign bondholders who rejected a debt restructuring in 2005, thereby restoring the government’s access to international financial markets. Martín Redrado, the bank’s governor, demurred, arguing that in an economy like Argentina’s, where many people think in dollars because of past hyperinflation, the reserves were an important cushion against swings in foreign-exchange markets. He was also advised that the transfer might make funds held by the Central Bank abroad vulnerable to claims by creditors.

Thwarted by Mr Redrado, Ms Fernández decided to sack him. Mr Redrado dug his heels in, insisting that only Congress could remove him. A judge who ruled in Mr Redrado’s favour in the dispute, María José Sarmiento, found the police on her doorstep on January 9th. If that was too subtle, the president’s chief of staff, Aníbal Fernández (who is not related to the president), told reporters that the judge’s every movement was being watched. Eventually the president got her way and Mr Redrado was replaced with a more pliant figure.

Not everyone is treated so harshly. Indeed, a few businessmen who enjoy good relations with the Kirchners have done well in recent years. They are known in Argentina as the empresarios K. One is Lázaro Báez, whose firm, Austral Construcciones, began life as a small builder in Santa Cruz and has since diversified into oil exploration and farming. Much of the company’s business has been in public-works projects in Santa Cruz. Mr Báez was also awarded oil-exploration rights in Santa Cruz.

 Shell was punished for refusing to co-operate

It was Mr Báez’s company, Epsur, which together with Enarsa, a state company, offered to buy Shell’s assets in Argentina in 2007. He has described his relationship with Néstor Kirchner as one of “platonic love.” Their affair goes back to the early 1990s, when Mr Báez worked as a manager in Banco Santa Cruz, a bank privatised by Mr Kirchner when he was governor.

Another friend is Cristóbal López, who controls a company called Casino Club and operates casinos and gambling halls throughout Argentina, including one at the Palermo racecourse. Shortly before leaving office, Mr Kirchner issued a decree extending Mr López’s licence to run the slot machines at the racecourse until 2032 and raising their number by 50%.

Enrique Eskenazi, a grandee of the private sector and the controlling shareholder in Banco Santa Cruz, argues that politics and business are so closely linked in Argentina because the country lacks the institutions that ought to separate them. In 2007 his company, Grupo Petersen, bought a 14.9% stake in YPF from Spain’s Repsol, which wanted a well-connected local partner for its troubled investment. So keen was Repsol to get Mr Eskenazi on board that it lent him more than $1 billion to buy the stake. He rejects any suggestion that Grupo Petersen’s success stems from his political connections. “Under President Alfonsín, people called us Alfonsinistas; under President Menem, we were Menemistas. Under the Kirchners, we’re Kirchneristas. We’re used to it.” In Argentina, he says, any success is viewed as suspicious, unless it is won on the football pitch.

Maybe so. But the Kirchners have left their country with weaker institutions, and an economy in which the state plays a much bigger role and in which political contacts often seem to make the difference between business success and failure. Mr Kirchner has hinted that he will run for president again in 2011. By then Argentines may want to see the back of him.

26 de febrero de 2010

Uruguay y Cuba los polos opuestos de America Latina


Uruguay Jose Mujica
terrorista, preso politico de la dictadura miltar, indultado, senador y presidente, dice ser defensor de los derechos humanos



Cuba Orlando Zapata
obrero, preso politico de la dictadura comunista, condenado a 35 anos de prision por defender los derechos humanos, torturado, muere en huelga de hambre, martir de la libertad cubana

Con quien esta Mujica? con Orlando o con sus asesinos Fidel y Raul Castro ?
o sigue con su doble discurso "como te digo una cosa te digo la otra"

los musulmanes siguen asesinando cristianos

Victims of Radical Islam

Christianity's Modern-Day Martyrs

Victims of Radical Islam: Christianity's Modern-Day Martyrs

The rise of Islamic extremism is putting increasing pressure on Christians in Muslim countries, who are the victims of murder, violence and discrimination. Christians are now considered the most persecuted religious group around the world. Paradoxically, their greatest hope could come from moderate political Islam. By SPIEGEL staff. more... [ Forum ]

la kermesse del Conrad la "patria contratista" porteña rodea a Mujica




De Posadas: “Con la kermesse del Conrad, los empresarios argentinos quisieron cooptar a Mujica”

"en cuanto a las reacciones empresariales del exterior tengo un poquito de prevención porque en Argentina hay una larga tradición de cooptación a los sucesivos poderes ejecutivos, lo que llaman la patria contratista, y al menos el origen de la "kermesse" del Conrad es eso, querer cooptar al presidente de la República.

EC - ¿Cómo, cómo, cómo?

I de P - Sí, es notorio. ¿Quién organizó lo del Conrad? Lo organizaron empresarios argentinos con intereses o expectativas vinculados al Estado uruguayo que dependen de decisiones del Poder Ejecutivo.

EC - Alude, por ejemplo, a López Mena.

I de P - Claro, y a otros. Ahí hay un claro ejercicio de cooptación, de lo cual espero que el presidente de la República sea muy consciente. Argentina tiene una larga experiencia en eso, son expertos en la materia.

Gritos de "libertad" en el entierro de Orlando Zapata


POR JUAN O. TAMAYO
Entre gritos de "abajo la dictadura'', y a pesar de una fuerte presencia de la policía secreta, unas 150 personas asistieron el jueves al sepelio de Orlando Zapata, un preso político que murió tras una huelga de hambre para protestar abusos en la cárcel.

"Esto me ha dado aún más fuerza para seguir luchando [. . .] por la democracia, la libertad, y pienso que él es un ejemplo para el pueblo cubano, una muestra de valentía'', afirmó su madre, Reina Tamayo.
Numerosos agentes de la Seguridad, "algunos incluso en los arbustos'', vigilaron mientras los 150 familiares, vecinos y disidentes caminaron desde la casa de Tamayo en el pueblo oriental de Banes hasta el cementerio, declaró Tamayo a El Nuevo Herald tras la ceremonia.
Gritos repetidos de "¡Libertad para todos los presos políticos!'', y "¡Abajo la dictadura!'' se escucharon de todos modos durante el entierro, según una grabación de la ceremonia enviada a un grupo en Miami que apoya a los disidentes en la isla.
La policía cubana toma el pueblo donde fue enterrado el prisionero político.- La muerte del disidente marca un antes y un después para Gobierno y oposición

la Rusia de Putin se estanca

The end seems near for the Putin model
By Anders Åslund Washington Post Friday, February 26, 2010
A recent week in Moscow left one clear impression: The Putin model of crony state capitalism is dead.

25 de febrero de 2010

exitos y fracasos de Tabaré Vasquez

EXITOS
Defensa de Botnia y el interés nacional frente a la prepotencia de Kirchner
El Plan Ceibal
El seguro universal de salud
El veto a el aborto por una cuestión de principios
Mejoro la imagen del país
El anillo perimetral de Montevideo
Excelente gestion de Puntigliano en el puerto
Mantuvo la libertad comercial en la agricultura que llegara a los mil millones en exportacion
lucha contra el vicio del tabaco

FRACASOS
Pésima gestión en el ministerio del interior de Díaz y la Daisy Tourne
Pésima gestión en relaciones exteriores de Gargano
Perdimos el tren del TLC con USA , Corea, Costa Rica, Canada y Chile por no atreverse a dejar el MERCOSUR
Desperdicio de recursos en los anos de vacas gordas
Reforma de la educación no sirve
Reforma del estado no se hizo nada
Afe no se hizo nada con los ferrocariles
Energia no se hizo casi nada en eolica y aumento la dependencia del petroleo
doble discurso oportunista con la ley de caducidad
talenteada egocentrica y arrogante de intentar reubicar los restos de Artigas

Muere lentamente - Pablo Neruda

Muere lentamente
quien no viaja, quien no lee,
Muere lentamente
quien destruye su amor propio,
quien no se deja ayudar.
Muere lentamente
quien se transforma en esclavo del hábito
repitiendo todos los días los mismos trayectos,
quien no cambia de marca,
no se atreve a cambiar el color de su vestimenta
o bien no conversa con quien no conoce.
Muere lentamente quien evita una pasión y su remolino de emociones, justamente éstas que regresan el brillo a los ojos y restauran los corazones destrozados.
Muere lentamente
quien no gira el volante cuando está
infeliz con su trabajo, o su amor,
quien no arriesga lo cierto ni lo incierto
para ir atrás de un sueño
quien no se permite, ni siquiera
una vez en su vida,
huir de los consejos sensatos...
¡ Vive hoy !
¡ Arriesga hoy !
¡ Hazlo hoy !
¡ No te dejes morir lentamente !
¡ NO TE IMPIDAS SER FELIZ !
Pablo Neruda

Argentina no tiene futuro

Jose Brechner, ex Diputado y Embajador de Bolivia ..
Argentina es el Tercer Mundo con gente bien vestida y rostro bonito
Cien años atrás el mundo veía a la Argentina como el país latinoamericano con mayor proyección internacional. El único que por el nivel educativo de sus inmigrantes, podía llegar a competir con los grandes.
Hoy la Argentina es el fiasco más dramático del continente. Hecho que demuestra, que no son solamente las personas instruidas las que generan el progreso y desarrollo de una nación, sino que el sistema empleado para lograr su avance económico es tanto o más importante que la erudición de sus habitantes. Los europeos bajo el dominio comunista no eran tontos ni ignorantes, pero eran despiadadamente pobres.
Si bien las naciones con elevado nivel instructivo y ético suelen llegar a ser más exitosas que las que carecen de esos atributos, el trabajo es mejor remunerado y los impuestos mejor distribuidos, en sociedades donde la libertad económica es irrestricta, y el gobierno no se inmiscuye en los negocios de las personas.
La Argentina no sólo eligió el camino económico equivocado, sino que carece de principios éticos. Se dejó llevar por la angurria de poder y dinero, pisoteando los valores que hacen a una sociedad decente.. Para reencauzarse, necesita por lo menos 20 años continuos de coherencia política y económica, sin sobresaltos, bajo el imperio de la ley.
Con sus actuales gobernantes y con el fantasma del peronismo, la misión es imposible.. A Perón no terminan de enterrarlo, y cuando se vive en el pasado no hay lugar para al futuro.
Las tácticas del manejo gubernamental obedecen a un caudillismo hereditario canceroso.
La Reina Cristina accedió al mando sin brindarse a una sola entrevista periodística ni a un debate con sus adversarios. Simplemente se sentó en el trono para hacer gala de sus trajecitos de diseñadores famosos, nunca vestidos dos veces. Desde Enero a la fecha su popularidad ha declinado de 56 por ciento a 19.9 por ciento.
La mujer no tiene un solo mérito o virtud, ni capacidad alguna para manejar un país. Su parodia de Evita, saca a relucir su agresivo estilo de piquetera populista cada vez que pronuncia una palabra. Si además es cierto que es maníaca depresiva, puede llevar a su país a una hecatombe peor a todas las que sufrió el pueblo argentino.
Cristina llegó al poder repartiendo dinero enviado de Venezuela por su buen amigo Hugo Chávez, y aprovechando de la maquinaria gubernamental manipulada por su marido. Está rodeada de individuos siniestros... Ex guerrilleros, terroristas y secuestradores, ahora convertidos en cleptómanos burgueses socialistas. Desde que inició su mandato no hizo nada positivo, ni podrá hacerlo.
Sigue extorsionando a los únicos que mantienen a flote el país: los productores agropecuarios.
En casi dos siglos la Argentina no ha logrado convertirse en exportador significativo de ningún artículo con alto valor agregado. Gracias a sus descarados e incompetentes gobernantes, continúa dependiendo del campo.
Los optimistas que hace 40 años quisieron crear una industria o comercio respetable, se encuentran hoy en peor situación económica que cuando empezaron.
Los guarismos señalan que 26.9 por ciento de la población vive debajo del nivel de pobreza. De acuerdo al Índice de Libertad Económica, Argentina se encuentra en el puesto 108 entre 157 países (Chile está en el número 8, Uruguay en el 40 y Perú en el 55). Entre 150 naciones la banca argentina ocupa el sitio 149.
La Argentina es el Tercer Mundo con gente bien vestida y rostro bonito.
- Las calles porteñas llenas de basura se asemejan a algunas urbes africanas.
- Las villas miserias se expandieron al centro.
- La criminalidad y falta de seguridad están enraizadas.
- La contaminación ambiental es asfixiante.
- La burocracia es insufrible.
- Los servicios son pésimos.
- Y la lista es larga.
En el último medio siglo Buenos Aires prácticamente no se modernizó.... Cualquier ciudad latinoamericana muestra comparativamente mayor desarrollo.
La Argentina desapareció del mapa internacional por completo. Los únicos países de América Latina que cuentan en el mundo son Brasil y México, a quienes los argentinos miraban desde arriba. Chile , Perú y Uruguay se encaminan hacia un futuro promisorio. Argentina no tiene futuro.
Jose Brechner

el imperialismo brasilero en Uruguay 1811- 1870

Uruguayos que colaboraron con el imperalismo luso brasilero
Fructuoso Rivera baron de Tacuarembo
Juan Francisco Giro tratado de la Farola 1819
Juan Jose Duran tratado de la Farola 1819 conde del Cordobés
Jeronimo Pio Bianqui
Alejandro Chucarro
Francisco Llambí
Dámaso Antonio Larrañaga
Tomás García de Zúñiga Baron de la Calera
Nicolas Herrera afrancesado antiartiguista leal servidor del imperio
Lucas Obes
Venancio_Flores
Uruguayos que pelearon contra el imperialismo brasilero
Jose Gervasio Artigas
Andrés Felipe Latorre
Juan Antonio Lavalleja y los Treinta y Tres Orientales
Manuel Oribe
Fernando Otorgués
Bernardo Berro
Leandro Gomez

Invasiones brasileras
Invasión portuguesa de 1811 y toma de las Misones orientales
Desde 1849, tras aplastar el imperio del Brasil a la República Riograndense, al concluir la Guerra de los Farrapos arreciaron las incursiones y ataques brasileños sobre el territorio uruguayo
tratado de paz 1852, Uruguay reconoce la soberanía brasileña sobre las Misiones Orientales — ya ocupada en los hechos por el Imperio de Brasil — más una franja adicional, entre los ríos Cuareim e Ibicuy..
Venancio Flores, se alió con los gobiernos de Brasil y Argentina e invadió el territorio uruguayo.

España; El fin del milagro

The Euro's Next Battleground: Spain

MADRID—Greece set off the crisis rattling the euro zone. Spain could determine whether the 16-nation currency stands or falls.

The euro zone's No. 4 economy, Spain has an unemployment rate of 19%, a deflating housing bubble, big debts and a gaping budget deficit. Its gross domestic product contracted 3.6% in 2009 and is expected to shrink again this year, leaving Spain in its deepest and longest recession in a half-century.

[SPAIN_p1]

At the center of the crisis are millions of Spaniards like Olga Espejo. The 41-year-old lost her administrative job at a laboratory in Madrid, then found a temporary post replacing someone on sick leave—until that job was abolished. Her husband and her sister have also been laid off—all among the one in nine working Spaniards who have lost jobs in the past two years.

Each gets an unemployment check of at least €1,000 a month, or about $1,350, part of a generous social safety net that Madrid says it won't cut. But Ms. Espejo's benefit runs out in July and her husband's in May.

"What prospects do any of us have now?" Ms. Espejo asks.

That question haunts Spain and the entire euro zone as the Continent faces its biggest economic crisis since the common currency launched in 1999. Worries over Greece's ability to finance its huge debts have spread to other, weaker members of the euro zone, but these same fears are now nipping at Spain's heels. The problem is that, thanks largely to its membership in the euro, Spain lacks tried-and-true means to heal its economy.

Spain can't devalue its currency to make its exports more attractive and its sunny beach resorts cheaper because the euro's value is driven by Germany's bigger, competitive industrial economy. Madrid can't slash interest rates or print money to spur borrowing and spending, because those decisions are now made in Frankfurt by the European Central Bank.

Spain could still try to stimulate growth through tax cuts and spending increases. But it has already mounted enormous stimulus spending that swelled its budget deficit to 11.4% of GDP last year, and it would need to sell more bonds to raise fresh cash. Buyers of Spanish government bonds, spooked by the prospect of a Greek default, have already demanded higher interest rates from Madrid.

"Spain is the real test case for the euro," says Desmond Lachman of the American Enterprise Institute in Washington. "If Spain is in deep trouble, it will be difficult to hold the euro together...and my own view is that Spain is in deep trouble."

Weighing the Options in Spain

Alvaro Leiva for The Wall Street Journal

In Madrid, Olga Espejo, her husband, José Antonio Sacristan, and her sister, Marisa Espejo, have all been laid off.They are among the nation's 4.3 million unemployed.

The government rejects talk of crisis. "The fundamentals of our economy are solid," Elena Salgado, Spain's economy minister, said in an interview. Ms. Salgado said the country's big banks are sound, its economic statistics credible and its companies dynamic enough to maintain their share of export markets. She pointed out that Spain was running budget surpluses until the financial crisis struck, and its government debt has grown from a very low base.

Euro-zone heavyweights Germany and France have pledged to support Greece if necessary. But any bailout for Spain—whose $1.6 trillion economy is nearly double those of troubled euro-zone partners Greece, Portugal and Ireland combined—would be far costlier.

A "shock and awe" infusion aimed at renewing faith in Spain's finances, should it be necessary, would take roughly $270 billion, according to an estimate by BNP Paribas. It estimates similar confidence-restoring moves in Greece, Ireland or Portugal would require $68 billion, $47 billion and $41 billion, respectively.

Some observers, to be sure, believe Spain will ride out the troubles. Emilio Ontiveros, president of AFI, a financial analysis firm in Madrid, says recovery is in sight in the second half of the year. "We've had some luck. France and Germany, our biggest markets, are beginning to grow," he said. This should be enough to stop unemployment rising much beyond 20%, a level Spain has coped with as recently as the late 1990s.

Most economists see three options for Spain.

The first is for the government to do nothing, leaving the economy to wallow through years of high unemployment and debt defaults. The second is for the government to take a more active role, slashing its spending while taking unpopular measures to boost the supply side of the economy, including overhauling a rigid labor market.

On Tuesday, Spain's top central banker strongly urged this path, calling in a speech for swift government action to reduce the budget deficit and reform the labor market.

"If the reforms come late or are insufficient, our future is undoubtedly worrying," Bank of Spain Governor Miguel Angel Fernández Ordoñez said.

[SPAIN_jmp]

Mr. Lachman of the American Enterprise Institute is among the pessimists who doubt the government will take this course. He thinks Spain's chronic inability to restart growth will lead it to contemplate a third option: splitting the euro zone asunder by withdrawing from the common currency. That would permit a devaluation that would, at a stroke, increase Spain's competitiveness and allow the economy to grow again.

A more mainstream view holds that no government, Spain's included, would dare to brave the financial chaos such a move would unleash.

"It's extremely costly to leave the euro," said Jean Pisani-Ferry of Bruegel, a pro-European think tank in Brussels. The moment a government hinted at a possible devaluation, there would be a run on the banks and an effective default on every euro financial contract with that country. "The day you start to admit that you're thinking about it, you're in a financial mess."

The government has announced plans, starting with tax rises and spending cuts this year, to slice the budget deficit to 3% of GDP by 2013, a program financial analysts have described as credible. It forecasts that public debt will crest at around 74% of GDP in 2012, compared with 113% today in Greece and Italy.

Still, Socialist Prime Minister José Luis Zapatero has drawn criticism from economists for saying he will deal with the crisis without hurting the country's social programs.

"That's not a plan, but an announcement," said Lorenzo Bernaldo de Quirós, president of Freemarket International Consulting in Madrid. As a result, he said, Spaniards don't yet understand that their comfortable way of life, cushioned by the state, is about to change. Spaniards still "think like Cubans and live like Yankees," he said.

Spain's troubles are a mirror of the boom years after it and 10 other countries entered the monetary union in 1999. The euro was meant to cement a single market across Europe, reducing cross-border costs for trade, investment and travel.

In close to a decade of good times, Spaniards overtook the Italians and approached the French in terms of what their salaries could buy. Spanish energy, infrastructure, utility and banking companies spread world-wide.

But seeds of trouble were being planted. Spain's wages grew fast, making its economy less and less competitive. Low euro interest rates, set with low-inflation Germany in mind, began generating a housing bubble.

Spanish house prices more than doubled in real terms in the decade ending in 2008. At the peak, the country of 45 million people was building more houses than Germany, France and Italy—combined population 200 million—put together.

Spain's housing market has been slow to adjust, likely delaying recovery. The Bank of Spain estimates prices have fallen 15% from their highs, about half the U.S. peak-to-trough decline. "In the U.S. market, the day of reckoning came quickly. In Spain, it's been postponed," said Mr. Ontiveros of AFI.

Europe's Debt Crisis

Take a look at events that have rattled European governments and global markets.

Growing Apart

Take a look at the premium in percentage points that selected euro-zone governments must past on their 10-year bonds.

The housing bust shows how Spain differs from Greece in the current crisis. Economists say Greece's troubles stem from its profligate government. Madrid ran budget surpluses for years— but Spain's private sector went on a debt-fueled spending binge.

Spanish private and public debt rose an average of 14.5% a year from 2000 to 2008, according to McKinsey Global Institute. Total debt peaked at the end of 2008 at $4.9 trillion, or 342% of GDP—a higher percentage than the level in the U.S. and most major economies except Britain and Japan. Six-sevenths of that is owed by the private sector.

McKinsey expects households, indebted companies and real-estate developers to shed debt, a widespread "deleveraging" that is likely to trigger defaults and harm the banking system. Most analysts say Spain's banking problems are concentrated in the country's 45cajas, regional savings banks usually run by local politicians that often went deep into real-estate lending.

Nonperforming loans in Spain's banks and regional savings institutions are now estimated at 5% of the total, up from 3.2% a year ago. Santiago López Díaz, a bank analyst at Credit Suisse in London, estimates this may underestimate the total by 30% to 40%.

Roughly half of Spain's estimated 1.3 million unsold houses are now on the books of cajas and banks, which have been slow to sell them because they don't want to realize losses. Financial institutions "have become the biggest realtors in Spain," said Fernando Encinar, co-founder of Idealista.com, Spain's largest property Web site.

The government has tried to force cajas to merge into stronger institutions, and has set up a fund to encourage them to restructure and bolster capital. Analysts expect cajas to post big losses this year that will likely force the government to raise more money to boost the fund.

Massive joblessness could further slow Spain's climb out of debt. Even in good times, unemployment never got below about 8%. Now the rate is nudging 20% overall and close to 45% among young people—statistics that reveal to economists a deeply flawed employment market.

Wages are set through a complicated system of bargaining with trade unions that imposes wage increases on firms even if their business can't afford it. Because wages are inflexible, Spanish companies can cut labor costs only by firing workers. Yet some workers, hired on so-called indefinite contracts, are deeply entrenched, not least because they are entitled to 45 days' severance pay per year of service.

So, when the economy turns down, those on temporary contracts bear the brunt. When prospects brighten, companies think long and hard before inking more indefinite contracts.

That bodes poorly for Eduardo García, 55, who was huddling in line outside a job center recently in Madrid's Santa Eugenia neighborhood. Unemployed for the first time, Mr. García worked for 25 years at a book-and-magazine distributor that closed in November. His wife and 20-year-old daughter are also unemployed. Mr. Garcia said he has had no work offers. "At my age, it will be difficult."

Madrid has vowed to reform the labor market. One proposal would reduce the severance-pay entitlement for new workers by 12 days, to 33 days.

Fernando Eguidazu, director-general of the Circulo de Empresarios, a business association, said Madrid has avoided locking horns with labor. Demonstrations against a proposal to raise the retirement age from 65 to 67 took place in several Spanish cities Tuesday and Wednesday.

Unions could resist new labor proposals, he said, but it's a needed step: "If they [the government] try to keep being nice to everybody, we are wasting time and the people and the markets are losing confidence."

That sentiment is already apparent in the market for insurance against a Spanish default. The price to insure €10 million in Spanish bonds for five years— just €2,350 three years ago— rose this month to €171,750 before falling to €125,000, said data firm Markit Group Ltd.

That translates into increased borrowing costs for Spain, which now pays about 0.8 percentage points more than Germany to borrow money for 10 years.

For years to come, Spain will largely be at the mercy of wary bond investors to finance its governments, banks and companies. The national government says it will have to raise €76.8 billion this year and pay back an additional €35 billion of maturing bonds.

Amid it all, Mr. Bernaldo de Quirós predicts, investors' worries will ebb and flow over what he calls "a real risk of default" as they await decisive government action. "They more time you lose," he said of the government, "the more devastating the adjustment has to be."

Write to Stephen Fidler at stephen.fidler@wsj.com